LCDInfo.com
http://forum.lcdinfo.com/

USB LCD in progress
http://forum.lcdinfo.com/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=230		 Page 2 of 3
Author:  Henri [ Sat Jun 21, 2003 19:26 ]
Post subject: 
ChriX wrote:
Has anybody considered trying one of the PICs that has USB communication built in, or is that not any good for this job?

I once looked into those but I wasn't very impressed with them. They only supported the slowest transfer modes and there wasn't much material available about them. Also there weren't any flash PICs available with USB.

I have seen some much better flash USB PICs mentioned but they aren't available yet.
Author:  Henri [ Sat Jun 21, 2003 19:31 ]
Post subject:  Re: Posibility ?
Marc wrote:
There are any possibility to connect a T6963C int the USB port ?

Greetings

Yes there is. My USB LCD mentioned here uses a T6963C display. Also I should be able to make it work with KS0108 or Noritake800 just as easily. This project just has been on hold for a while as there have been so many other things to do. But it will continue because my experiences with it have been very positive.
Author:  ChriX [ Sun Jun 22, 2003 11:42 ]
Post subject: 
Ooo, so LCDInfo will soon have support for USB modules then? Sounds good. :)

Henri, do you have an 88x31 banner, realised I don't have a link to you on the LCDGallery?
Author:  Henri [ Sun Jun 22, 2003 22:41 ]
Post subject: 
Yes, USB support is coming. :)

At the moment I don't have any banners but I think there's one coming in future as well as the new website.
Author:  ChriX [ Tue Jun 24, 2003 0:49 ]
Post subject: 
How come you chose to use the 245BM over the 232BM? I know that the 232 converts to serial and the 245 to parallel, but surely if you used the 232 you would only use 2 pins i/o on the PIC rather than the 8+ for parallel, enabling you to have a smaller PIC?
Author:  Henri [ Tue Jun 24, 2003 14:00 ]
Post subject: 
ChriX wrote:
How come you chose to use the 245BM over the 232BM? I know that the 232 converts to serial and the 245 to parallel, but surely if you used the 232 you would only use 2 pins i/o on the PIC rather than the 8+ for parallel, enabling you to have a smaller PIC?

Speed. :D

I chose the parallel version because it's faster than serial. I don't have 232BM chips but it might be worth trying how much the speed difference is as you would definately save some pins this way.
Author:  ChriX [ Thu Jun 26, 2003 0:24 ]
Post subject: 
Heh, thanks for clearing that up for me, I never thought about speed! :o

I was just looking at the back of one of my MO usb units and noticed they used the 232BM, but then again they are only character units so don't need as much bandwidth.
Author:  stef [ Wed Jul 02, 2003 17:43 ]
Post subject: 
hi everybody !


I am thinking on the lcd by usb as well , I choose :

pic 16f876
USBN9604 from national.com
cfag12864b fron crystalfontz.com

I am still waiting the lcd , but i will send picture soon as i can .
Author:  Henri [ Sat Jul 05, 2003 10:15 ]
Post subject: 
stef wrote:
hi everybody !

I am thinking on the lcd by usb as well , I choose :

pic 16f876
USBN9604 from national.com
cfag12864b fron crystalfontz.com

I am still waiting the lcd , but i will send picture soon as i can .

Sure, just keep us informed of your progress.

Maybe some "competition" would help me to finish my usb lcd also. ;)
Author:  Guest [ Mon Jul 07, 2003 15:13 ]
Post subject: 
yes i am register now :wink:

Waou a competition you say !!

why not , i will have too many difficulty for the usb , i don't know too much program .

assambler on intel or pic ok , electronic ok but driver , software on windows or linux , I never done .


ps : the web site lcdinfo are in FINLAND ?
Author:  stef [ Mon Jul 07, 2003 15:14 ]
Post subject: 
oups , sorry it forget to login :roll:
it was me .
Author:  Henri [ Mon Jul 07, 2003 20:13 ]
Post subject: 
Anonymous wrote:
assambler on intel or pic ok , electronic ok but driver , software on windows or linux , I never done .

Do you have any software examples for the National USB chip ? I would also be interested in seeing them if there are any available.
One reason I chose the FTDI chip is that there were ready made drivers and software examples available. I have never done driver programming for windows but maybe I should try that one day. ;)

Quote:
ps : the web site lcdinfo are in FINLAND ?

Yes, the server running this forum and most of the site (skippari.net) is in Finland - just like me. ;) The plan is to move the site to another server (lcdinfo.com) later.
Author:  stef [ Tue Jul 08, 2003 14:05 ]
Post subject: 
I choose the usbn9604 from national because , one side the usb plug direct connect , the other side just cpu control . ( i asked in sample from national , so free :wink: ) . and the usb driver ( electrical ) are built inside .

this chip respect the usb protocol , so any usb frame should work , may be libusb will be enought , ( may be not for me !! ) .


on my project I want program pic , and keep control of everything ( lcd usb ...) that why i choose this componant .

for the usb frame i have to make from computer , will be hard but i ant learn something ...

you said FINLAND ! wouaou I like to go there ( may be a day :roll: ) anyway , you have the welcome from FRANCE .

stef
Author:  Henri [ Wed Jul 09, 2003 0:27 ]
Post subject: 
Thanks, you're also welcome to Finland any day you choose. :D
Author:  Guest [ Thu Oct 16, 2003 15:22 ]
Post subject:  232BM
You guys appear to know about usb, Please could you tell me what pins do what in a USB B plug/socket?
Page 2 of 3 All times are UTC + 2 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/